Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 3/3/2000
Commonwealth v. Valentin
Citations
- 748 A.2d 711
- 2000 Pa. Super. 63
- 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 212
- 2000 WL 235689
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that police detained a suspected drug dealer for investigative purposes, not custodial, when police directed him to place his hands on a car and held his clothes because the officers did not interrogate him, display their weapons, threaten him, or transport him against his will
- officer had reasonable suspicion to stop and search when he witnessed exchange of cash for small objects in area with reputation for drug sales
- “While the sole purpose of the exclusionary rule under the Fourth Amendment is to deter police misconduct, Article I, section 8, [of the Pennsylvania Constitution] is meant to embody a strong, abiding, and distinctive notion of privacy.”
- defendant’s admission -6- J-A23028-14 during investigative detention that he “[had] two bags of dope in [his] pocket” gave rise to probable cause to arrest the defendant and conduct a search of defendant's pockets incident to lawful arrest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson, Cercone, Olszewski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. UngerOregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-28· cited 113×
- Commonwealth v. LuczkiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-06-07· cited 110×
- Commonwealth v. CollinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-06-04· cited 96×
- Commonwealth v. PhinnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-10-16· cited 80×
- Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-07-09· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. LylesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-09-10· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. MulhollandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-03-07· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. ReedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-06-03· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. LiddieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-05-16· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. SeilhamerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-11-23· cited 14×
- In the Interest of R.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-02-07· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. WitherspoonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-07-03· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. FirmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-31· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. RevereSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-11-20· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. WorthySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-06-29· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. JamesBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 2014-07-09
- In Re: $300,000 in U.S. Currency -- Appeal of: Z. XuCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-07-16
- Com. v. James, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-02-26
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 3,282×
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-02-04· cited 776×
- Commonwealth v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-07-23· cited 242×
- Commonwealth v. MatosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-02-26· cited 208×
- Commonwealth v. GwynnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-01-13· cited 97×
- Commonwealth v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-01-28· cited 91×
- Commonwealth v. StevensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-20· cited 73×
- Commonwealth v. QuilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-01-04· cited 68×
- Commonwealth v. EppsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-18· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. GommerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-10-05· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-08-21· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. LongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-12-20· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. SchatzelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-12-04· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.