Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Valentin

Citations

  • 748 A.2d 711
  • 2000 Pa. Super. 63
  • 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 212
  • 2000 WL 235689

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that police detained a suspected drug dealer for investigative purposes, not custodial, when police directed him to place his hands on a car and held his clothes because the officers did not interrogate him, display their weapons, threaten him, or transport him against his will
  • officer had reasonable suspicion to stop and search when he witnessed exchange of cash for small objects in area with reputation for drug sales
  • “While the sole purpose of the exclusionary rule under the Fourth Amendment is to deter police misconduct, Article I, section 8, [of the Pennsylvania Constitution] is meant to embody a strong, abiding, and distinctive notion of privacy.”
  • defendant’s admission -6- J-A23028-14 during investigative detention that he “[had] two bags of dope in [his] pocket” gave rise to probable cause to arrest the defendant and conduct a search of defendant's pockets incident to lawful arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Cercone, Olszewski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.