Woodlin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that as of the 1991 opinion in Ray v. State, “the declarant must also be subject to cross-examination on the content of the statement as well its truthfulness.”
• finding truthfulness implicitly affirmed where the testimony of a witness was consistent with her prior recorded statements
• “[T]he trial judge ‘must be satisfied that the offering party has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the statement was voluntarily made, and must render an explicit determination on the issue before admitting it for the jury’s consideration.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).