Skip to main content

Martin v. State

Citations

  • 433 A.2d 1025

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on testimony from Delaware officers that they would have sought a search warrant in another state, after their colleagues from that state had already conducted a warrantless search
  • explaining a “saturation investigation” is where officers “might be expected as a matter of course to make an unusually thorough investigation utilizing more available avenues or techniques than they ordinarily might.”
  • “This Court will not disturb conclusions of fact made by the trial court when supported by competent evidence.”
  • “The inquiry under § 271 is not whether each accomplice had the specific intent to commit murder, but whether [the accomplice] intended to promote or facilitate the principal’s conduct constituting the offense.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “This Court approved the inevitable discovery exception in Cook v. State.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duffy, McNeilly, Horsey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.