Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 11/21/1973
Coble v. State
Citations
- 501 S.W.2d 344
- 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2133
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- opining that “[o]ften, the decision to not cross-examine a witness is the result of wisdom acquired by experience in the combat of trial”
- stating the decision not to cross-examine a witness often is the result of wisdom acquired by experience in the combat of trial.
- overruling the claim that counsel was ineffective for not cross-examining three of the nine State witnesses because “[o]ften, the decision to not cross-examine a witness is the result of wisdom acquired by experience in the combat of trial”
- overruling the claim that counsel was ineffective for not cross- examining three of the nine State witnesses because ―[o]ften, the decision to not cross-examine a witness is the result of wisdom acquired by experience in the combat of trial‖
- “Often, the decision to not cross-examine a witness is the result of wisdom acquired by experience in the combat of trial.”
- “Often, the decision to not cross-examine a witness is the result of wisdom acquired by experience in the combat of trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ex Parte DuffyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-10-01· cited 683×
- Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-05-14· cited 435×
- Miniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-01-22· cited 290×
- Ex Parte McFarlandCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-05-18· cited 236×
- Benoit v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-05-25· cited 123×
- Garner v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1994-01-26· cited 97×
- Hunnicutt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-01-14· cited 92×
- Ryan v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1996-12-19· cited 80×
- Dannhaus v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1996-01-25· cited 55×
- Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-12-20· cited 46×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-07-17· cited 46×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-07-21· cited 31×
- Lavigne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-11-09· cited 18×
- Matthews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1992-05-07· cited 16×
- Jose Rodriguez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2018-07-02· cited 16×
- Gentry v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1982-02-24· cited 8×
- James v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-12-08· cited 6×
- Harris v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1982-10-13· cited 5×
- Norma Jean Clark v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2015-01-16
- Charles Ukanwa Ojo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-11-16
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Thomas Lorenzo Williams v. Dr. George Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsFifth Circuit· 1966-02-01· cited 297×
- Satillan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-09-16· cited 46×
- Witt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-12-07· cited 43×
- Broussard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-07-07· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.