Click v. Copeland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a transfer from law enforcement to jail guard was like a demotion and constituted an adverse employment action because it was less interesting, less prestigious, and provided less opportunity for promotion
• holding \[t]he law was established clearly enough in this circuit \ despite a conflict with two other circuits
• finding that evidence of motivation for adverse employment action, along with plaintiffs evidence supporting a contrary inference, is “fodder for the jury”
• noting that the deputy positions ■ of civil warrants officer and chief criminal district court bailiff did not involve policymaking
• holding “[t]he law was established clearly enough in this circuit” despite a conflict with two other circuits
• concluding that “running for elected office[] addresse[s] matters of public concern”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).