Skip to main content
· 3/27/2015

Micah Phillips v. City of Dallas

Citations

  • 781 F.3d 772
  • 39 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1579
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 5031
  • 98 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,289
  • 2015 WL 1449903

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding Letter Carriers supplants Pickering in cases involving a public employee’s right to seek and hold elected office
  • upholding the Dallas resign to run law, which covered city employees seeking public office in any county that had a contractual relationship with the city
  • holding that a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is subject to the same standards applicable to motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)
  • holding that a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is subject to the same standards applicable to motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)
  • “This court has been unequivocal in its recognition of a First Amendment interest in candidacy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Southwick, Costa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.