Keenan v. Tejeda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “this case does not involve an employment or other contractual relationship between the plaintiffs and the governmental officials” and instead concerns “an ordinary citizen”
• explaining that \ '[e]ven an issue raised in the complaint but ignored at summary judgment may be deemed waived' \
• noting that \an issue raised in the complaint but ignored at summary judgment may be deemed waived[ ]\
• noting that “an issue raised in the complaint but ignored at summary judgment may be deemed waived []”
• noting that “an issue raised in the complaint but ignored at summary judgment may be deemed waived”
• noting that “an issue raised in the complaint but ignored at summary judgment may be deemed waived” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).