Alvarado v. Texas Rangers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the same framework applies to gender-discrimination claims under Title VII when there is “no direct evidence of discrimination”
• holding that “a transfer . . . can be a demotion if the new position proves objectively worse”
• recognizing that the same framework applies to gender-discrimination claims under Title VII when there is “no direct evidence of discrimination”
• holding that genuine issue of material fact existed for summary judgment purposes with respect to question of adverse employment action related to a failure to promote .with eight different explicit evidentiary points for consideration
• holding that genuine issue of material fact existed for summary judgment purposes with respect to question of adverse employment action related to a failure to promote with eight different explicit evidentiary points for consideration
• finding that there was no evidence as to how the interviewers arrived at their scores

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).