S.D. Illinois· 3/28/2019
Clean Coal Techs., Inc. v. Leidos, Inc.
Citations
- 377 F. Supp. 3d 303
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting defendant’s motion to dismiss because “there 14 [was] no allegation that [the plaintiff] directed or commanded [the third-party] to breach” the contract
- dismissing tortious interference claim where the defendant had made an independent decision to breach the contract, even though the decision “may have been eased by certain actions taken by [other defendants]”
- “It is axiomatic that a complaint cannot be amended by the briefs in opposition to a motion to dismiss.” (citation omitted)
- plaintiff failed to allege procurement because there were no factual allegations that the third party directed, commanded, or set in motion the defendant’s alleged breach
- it is “axiomatic that a complaint cannot be amended by a brief in opposition to a motion to dismiss”
- it is “axiomatic that a complaint cannot be amended by a brief in opposition to a motion to dismiss” (quoting LLM Bar Exam, LLC v. Barbri, Inc., 271 F. Supp. 3d 547, 580 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Failla
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Harris v. MillsSecond Circuit· 2009-07-09· cited 5,185×
- Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1996-06-13· cited 1,127×
- Faber v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSecond Circuit· 2011-08-05· cited 899×
- Brenda Curtis and Alvin Williamson v. Citibank, N.A., Citicorp North America, Inc. And Citicorp SecuritiesSecond Circuit· 2000-09-19· cited 587×
- Cutco Industries, Inc. v. Dennis E. NaughtonSecond Circuit· 1986-11-26· cited 566×
- Kreutter v. McFadden Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1988-03-29· cited 515×
- Harsco Corp. v. SeguiSecond Circuit· 1996-08-01· cited 509×
- Dorchester Financial Securities, Inc. v. Banco BRJ, S.A.Second Circuit· 2013-07-03· cited 499×
- Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & RodriguezSecond Circuit· 1999-03-26· cited 482×
- Licci Ex Rel. Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, SALSecond Circuit· 2012-03-05· cited 475×
- Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank SALSecond Circuit· 2013-10-18· cited 441×
- Carvel Corp. v. NoonanNew York Court of Appeals· 2004-10-14· cited 415×
- Spiegel v. SchulmannSecond Circuit· 2010-05-06· cited 409×
- In Re Elevator Antitrust LitigationSecond Circuit· 2007-09-04· cited 400×
- A.I. Trade Finance, Inc. v. Petra BankSecond Circuit· 1993-03-15· cited 312×
- Pdk Labs, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Mitchell K. Friedlander, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantSecond Circuit· 1997-01-09· cited 305×
- Pino Distefano v. Carozzi North America, Inc.Second Circuit· 2001-10-18· cited 302×
- In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 (Asat Trust Reg.)Second Circuit· 2013-04-16· cited 289×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.