Harris v. Mills

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that regardless of the holdings of Twombly and Iqbal that the court is obligated to liberally interpret pro se complaints
• holding that Title II ADA suits for prospective injunctive relief may proceed against individual officers in their official capacities
• holding that individuals can only be sued under the ADA in their official capacities for prospective injunctive relief
• holding that individuals can only be sued under the ADA in their official capacities for prospective injunctive relief
• holding that Title II ADA suits and Rehabilitation Act suits for prospective injunctive relief may be brought under Ex parte Young against state officers in their official capacities
• holding that a claim for prospective injunctive relief brought pursuant to Title II of the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act may be maintained against an individual acting in her official capacity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).