Pino Distefano v. Carozzi North America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Section 302(a)(3) is met “where the first effect of the tort . . . that ultimately produced the final economic injury is located” in New York
• holding that in deciding pre-discovery whether personal jurisdiction exists, the trial court must “construe the pleadings .. . in the light most favorable to [Plaintiff], resolving all doubts in [its] favor,”
• “constru[ing] the pleadings and affidavits in the light most favorable to [the plaintiff]”
• “constru[ing] the pleadings and affidavits in the light most favorable to [the plaintiff]”
• applying the “situs-of-injury test” to determine jurisdiction under CPLR § 302(a)(3)
• “We construe the pleadings and affidavits in the light most favorable to [the plaintiff], resolving all doubts in his favor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).