In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 (Asat Trust Reg.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that courts need not consider conclusory, non-specific allegations made to support personal jurisdiction
• holding that “conclusory” allegations are “insufficient for specific 8 personal jurisdiction purposes”
• stating that the complaint “must include an averment of facts that, if credited by the ultimate trier of fact, would suffice to establish jurisdiction over the defendant”
• finding that minimum contacts with the forum for general jurisdiction are assessed “at the time the initial complaint was filed.”
• noting that jurisdictional discovery had taken place and requiring evidentiary support for jurisdictional allegations
• noting that jurisdictional discovery had taken place and requiring evidentiary support for jurisdictional allegations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).