Skip to main content

Rodriguez v. State

Citations

  • 819 S.W.2d 871
  • 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 265
  • 1991 WL 253103

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding rational trier of fact could have found all elements of offense beyond a reasonable doubt based on outcry testimony and victim = s testimony
  • holding testimony from outcry witness sufficient to support conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child
  • recognizing outcry testimony alone can be legally sufficient evidence to support a conviction for sexual assault of a child
  • holding testimony from outcry witness was sufficient to support conviction for aggravated sexual assault of child
  • recognizing outcry testimony alone can be legally sufficient evidence to support a conviction for sexual assault of a child
  • holding that article 38.072 required complainant's availability to testify

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Overstreet, Clinton, Maloney, Benavides

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

229 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.