Skip to main content

Stevens v. State

Citations

  • 671 S.W.2d 517
  • 1984 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 655

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that no harm was shown by trial court’s refusal of defendant’s requested charge because it was substantially same as charge given by court
  • holding admissible as voluntary defendant's statement made when in custody but not in response to interrogation
  • holding admissible as voluntary defendant=s statement made when in custody but not in response to interrogation
  • stating that when an accused spontaneously volunteers information that is not in response to questioning, the statement is admissible
  • stating that when an accused spontaneously volunteers information that is not in response to questioning, the statement is admissible
  • finding appellant’s statements to be admissible under Article 38.22 because “the statements were voluntary statements, made while in custody but not in response to interrogation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Teague, Miller, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.