Supreme Court of Arkansas· 5/4/1992
Butler v. State
Citations
- 829 S.W.2d 412
- 309 Ark. 211
- 1992 Ark. LEXIS 285
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting the Fourth Amendment as requiring an \exigent circumstance requiring immediate aid or action\ beyond a mere hot pursuit where the suspected crime is a minor offense
- interpreting the Fourth Amendment as requiring an \exigent circumstance requiring immediate aid or action\ beyond a mere hot pursuit where the suspected crime is a minor offense
- hot pursuit alone is an insufficient justification for war-rantless entry into home; exigent circumstances required for disorderly conduct
- hot pursuit alone is an insufficient justification for warrantless entry into home; exigent circumstances required for disorderly conduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stanton v. SimsSupreme Court· 2013-11-04· cited 600×
- Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-04-16· cited 84×
- State v. RichterWisconsin Supreme Court· 2000-06-20· cited 81×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-03-25· cited 68×
- Humphrey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-03-24· cited 66×
- Norris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-07-15· cited 58×
- Lange v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2021-06-23· cited 52×
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-02-28· cited 49×
- McFerrin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2001-05-10· cited 29×
- Holmes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-02-07· cited 27×
- Kimble v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-01-22· cited 26×
- Baird v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-05-27· cited 16×
- Mann v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-04-29· cited 16×
- Stutte v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2014-02-26· cited 6×
- Baird v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2003-11-12· cited 5×
- Wells v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2005-11-16· cited 3×
- Dendy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2005-11-30· cited 2×
- Opinion No.Arkansas Attorney General Reports· 2001-02-28
- Lange v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2021-06-24
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.