Skip to main content

Butler v. State

Citations

  • 951 N.E.2d 255
  • 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 1206
  • 2011 WL 2528329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant was adequately advised of his right to counsel and knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right
  • holding that a trial court’s constant reaffirming that defendant understood rights and would be forfeiting them comported with due process requirements for probation revocation
  • holding that the defendant’s waiver of counsel was knowing and voluntary where “[t]he record shows that the trial court advised [defendant] of his right to counsel and that [defendant] unequivocally waived that right”
  • noting probationer’s extensive experience with the criminal justice system as supporting its conclusion that he knowingly waived his right to counsel
  • affirming 3 imposition of balance of suspended sentence based on defendant’s criminal history and prior unsuccessful probation
  • concluding waiver of counsel was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirsch, Mathias, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.