Tucker v. Tucker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• former spouse to participate in income \subject to income and any other taxes in her hands\
• former spouse to participate in income “subject to income and any other taxes in her hands”
• express trusts found distributable where family was living on the income

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Di Tolvo v. Di Tolvo
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1974-11-07· cited 59×
• Bussell v. Bussell
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1981-02-20· cited 53×
• Crawford v. Crawford
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-04-07· cited 39×
• Miller v. Miller
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1978-06-05· cited 35×
• Weir v. Weir
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1980-02-21· cited 30×
• Blitt v. Blitt
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-01-22· cited 29×
• Kruger v. Kruger
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-02-23· cited 25×
• White v. White
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-10-24· cited 21×
• Pellegrino v. Pellegrino
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-06-09· cited 20×
• Mey v. Mey
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-04-13· cited 7×
• Yonadi v. Commissioner
  Third Circuit· 1994-04-14· cited 3×
• Erlanger v. Erlanger
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-05-30· cited 2×
• Rand v. Director
  New Jersey Tax Court· 1988-02-05· cited 2×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1994-04-14· cited 1×
• Uslar v. Uslar
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-01-23· cited 1×
• Sc v. Ac
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1973-04-30
• Wajda v. Wajda
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-06-02

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Busby v. Busby
  Texas Supreme Court· 1970-07-29· cited 302×
• See v. See
  California Supreme Court· 1966-07-01· cited 127×
• Benson v. City of Los Angeles
  California Supreme Court· 1963-08-27· cited 95×
• LeClert v. LeClert
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1969-04-28· cited 83×
• Webster v. Webster
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1969-06-11· cited 39×
• Carson v. Carson
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1967-12-12· cited 38×
• Morris v. Morris
  Washington Supreme Court· 1966-10-06· cited 37×
• State v. Tate
  Washington Supreme Court· 1968-08-01· cited 32×
• Williamson v. Williamson
  California Court of Appeal· 1962-04-26· cited 29×
• Cheney v. City & County of San Francisco Employees Retirement System
  California Supreme Court· 1936-10-23· cited 26×
• MacKenzie v. Sellner
  Washington Supreme Court· 1961-04-13· cited 22×
• Edwards v. Edwards
  Washington Supreme Court· 1968-08-15· cited 16×
• Price v. Price
  California Court of Appeal· 1963-06-06· cited 15×
• Calame v. Calame
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1874-11-15· cited 15×
• Painter v. Painter
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1972-02-16· cited 13×
• In Re Estate of Osicka
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1969-11-13· cited 11×
• Busby v. Busby
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1969-03-26· cited 9×
• Angott v. Angott
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1970-12-31· cited 6×
• Low v. McCallan
  California Supreme Court· 1883-07-02· cited 6×
• Trotta v. Trotta
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1968-10-29· cited 5×