Skip to main content
· 8/10/1964

Montgomery Ward v. Thomas

Citations

  • 394 P.2d 774
  • 1964 Alas. LEXIS 232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that testimony could have been discovered before trial despite being unanticipated where counsel had one full week before trial in which he could have contacted witness and moving party “had available to him ample discovery tools”
  • granting or refusal of request for new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nesbett, Dimond, Arend

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.