Skip to main content

Roy v. State

Citations

  • 62 A.3d 1183
  • 2012 WL 6204793
  • 2012 Del. LEXIS 639

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that issues raised for the first time on appeal are reviewed only for plain error, and plain error “generally [means] that it must have affected the outcome of [the] trial”
  • finding “incriminating evidence derived from illegal police conduct – termed the ‘fruit of the poisonous tree’ – must . . . be excluded”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berger, Holland, Jacobs, Ridgely, Steele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.