Supreme Court of Delaware· 3/17/2009
Greene v. State
Citations
- 966 A.2d 824
- 2009 Del. LEXIS 138
- 2009 WL 684107
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- even though self-incriminating statements were erroneously admitted, because “a rational jury could [have] credit[ed]” other “testimony, standing alone” to find the defendant guilty, the error was harmless
- “[W]e review an evidentiary ruling resulting in an alleged constitutional violation de novo.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holland, Berger, Jacobs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- United States v. Sewn NewtonSecond Circuit· 2004-05-26· cited 366×
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1991-07-31· cited 124×
- Monroe v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1995-01-25· cited 108×
- Flonnory v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-02-01· cited 78×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-04-06· cited 55×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2005-07-01· cited 31×
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-09-14· cited 20×
- Greene v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-12-11· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.