Skip to main content

Phillips v. State

Citations

  • 154 A.3d 1146
  • 2017 Del. LEXIS 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to sever charges related to homicides from gang participation- related charges because the evidence in the indictment supporting the charges was inextricably intertwined
  • jury “could and should take into consideration” witness’s plea agreement that contained certain benefits when determining the credibility of witness’s testimony
  • “This Court reviews ‘a trial judge’s application of the Superior Court Rules relating to discovery’—such as the protective orders at issue here—‘for an abuse of discretion.’”
  • “Juries are presumed to follow the trial judge’s instructions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Strine, Holland, Valihura, Vaughn, Seitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.