Supreme Court of Delaware· 1/20/1982
Bailey v. State
Citations
- 440 A.2d 997
- 1982 Del. LEXIS 337
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the prosecution, during its rebuttal, to discuss testimony not mentioned by the defense or by the prosecution in its opening closing statement
- finding that a tip from citizen informant was corroborated when police found the victim’s body at the identified location
- finding a tip to be sufficiently corroborated where a known informant told the officer of the occurrence and location of a shooting and the police officer “confirmed the information by finding the victim’s body at the location described by [the informant]”
- use of the State’s rebuttal closing argument to make new arguments to the jury so as to deprive defense counsel of the opportunity to reply to these arguments was prejudicial “sandbagging”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Herrmann, Duffy, McNeilly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- v. PayneColorado Court of Appeals· 2019-11-14· cited 288×
- Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1990-12-21· cited 248×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-11-06· cited 152×
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1987-03-03· cited 118×
- Hammond v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1989-12-28· cited 91×
- Ortiz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2005-01-25· cited 86×
- Flamer v. State of DelawareThird Circuit· 1995-10-19· cited 84×
- Jensen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-09-11· cited 82×
- Brokenbrough v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1987-03-18· cited 69×
- State v. SissonSuperior Court of Delaware· 2005-03-11· cited 62×
- Whalen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1985-04-12· cited 61×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-04-06· cited 55×
- Cloroben Chemical Corp. v. ComegysSupreme Court of Delaware· 1983-07-28· cited 49×
- Lovett v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1986-10-09· cited 49×
- Jenner v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-08-31· cited 43×
- Porter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-06-19· cited 43×
- In the Matter of ButlerSupreme Court of Delaware· 1992-06-23· cited 36×
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1993-08-11· cited 28×
- Forrest v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1999-01-06· cited 23×
- Rush v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1985-03-18· cited 23×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 3,922×
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 2,172×
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1,729×
- Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1980-05-30· cited 167×
- State v. HaleSupreme Court of Missouri· 1963-10-14· cited 79×
- State v. RosaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-03-23· cited 52×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Delaware· 1978-08-15· cited 38×
- United States v. John Ellis LawsonEighth Circuit· 1974-01-07· cited 37×
- Goldstein v. FendelmanSupreme Court of Missouri· 1960-06-13· cited 36×
- Garner v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1973-09-14· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. GuessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-05-25· cited 32×
- Shaw v. Terminal Railroad Ass'n of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri· 1961-03-13· cited 30×
- John Moore v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1965-03-11· cited 29×
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1973-12-14· cited 28×
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1968-02-12· cited 26×
- Warren v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-02· cited 24×
- Misch v. CB Contracting CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1965-07-28· cited 21×
- Reddell v. NortonSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1956-01-23· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.