Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 846 So. 2d 1114
  • 2003 WL 1922673

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding appellate court will not second-guess strategic decisions on collateral attack
  • finding defense counsel's reference to victim \gurgling\ on his own blood was a reasonable trial tactic seeking to dilute some of the damaging testimony the jury would later hear
  • analyzing cumulative - 59 - error separately and holding that a cumulative error claim fails when the defendant fails to establish any of his claims under Strickland
  • “Each of Brown’s claims is insufficient under Strickland, and because this is the case, the claim for cumulative error fails as well.”
  • “Absent extraordinary circumstances, strategic or tactical decisions by trial counsel are not grounds for ineffective assistance of counsel claims.”
  • \[T]his Court will not second-guess counsel's strategic decisions on collateral attack.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.