Skip to main content
· 1/29/1980

Henn v. Henn

Citations

  • 605 P.2d 10
  • 26 Cal. 3d 323
  • 161 Cal. Rptr. 502
  • 1980 Cal. LEXIS 138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • preclusive effect does not apply to trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion when it was not possible to determine the basis for the trial court’s decision
  • spouse's entitlement arises at time property is acquired
  • spouse’s entitlement arises at time property is acquired
  • authorizing recovery by separate action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bird

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.