Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1/30/1984

Day v. Day

Citations

663 S.W.2d 719
281 Ark. 261
1984 Ark. LEXIS 1526

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that husband’s interest in retirement plan was “vested” because it could not be unilaterally terminated by the employer without also terminating the employment relationship
holding that husband’s interest in retirement plan was “vested” because it could not be unilaterally terminated by the employer without also terminating the employment relationship
holding husband’s interest in the retirement plan sponsored by his employer was marital property.
wherein the court upheld the trial court’s decision applying all the husband’s contributions made to the plan after the divorce to his benefit only
wherein the court upheld the trial court's decision applying all the husband's contributions made to the plan after the divorce to his benefit only
court held husband’s vested pension benefits were marital property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: George Rose Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Day v. Day

85 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.