Skip to main content

Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.

Citations

  • 52 Cal. App. 4th 820
  • 60 Cal. Rptr. 2d 780
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 1354
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 948
  • 1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 89

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The courts use an objective standard, rather than a subjective standard, when determining whether a former client would have fared better in the underlying suit”
  • legal 4 Despite Ford's reliance on Hal!ingby, this case counsels against carrying out a trial within a trial here. In Hallingby, the Husband procured annuities providing monthly payments to Husband after he retired. Id. at 362. Husband designated his first wife (\Ex Wife\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klein, Croskey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

82 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.