Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The courts use an objective standard, rather than a subjective standard, when determining whether a former client would have fared better in the underlying suit”
• legal 4 Despite Ford's reliance on Hal!ingby, this case counsels against carrying out a trial within a trial here. In Hallingby, the Husband procured annuities providing monthly payments to Husband after he retired. Id. at 362. Husband designated his first wife (\Ex Wife\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-04-09· cited 44×
• Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1990-09-20· cited 28×
• Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-09-29· cited 27×