Skip to main content
· 10/7/2008

Brodsky v. Yahoo! Inc.

Citations

  • 592 F. Supp. 2d 1192
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81549
  • 2008 WL 4531815

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring a plaintiff to allege “objective indicators” to bolster the plausibility of a confidential witness’s observations when those observations are conelusory
  • “on the technology front we hit the ball out of the park” held inactionable as vague assertion constituting mere puffery upon which no reasonable customer would rely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Claudia Wilken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.