In Re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court need not accept as true “allegations that are merely conclusory”
• stating that a court is 21 not required to accept as true “allegations that are merely conclusory, unwarranted deductions of 22 fact, or unreasonable inferences”
• stating that a court is 9 not required to accept as true “allegations that are merely conclusory, unwarranted deductions of 10 fact, or unreasonable inferences”
• noting that reviewing court need not accept as true 27 “allegations that are merely conclusory, unwarranted deductions 28 of fact, or unreasonable inferences”
• noting that reviewing court need not accept as true 27 “allegations that are merely conclusory, unwarranted deductions 28 of fact, or unreasonable inferences”
• stating that a court is 18 not required to accept as true “allegations that are merely conclusory, unwarranted deductions of 19 fact, or unreasonable inferences”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).