Ninth Circuit· 8/11/2008
In Re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Citations
- 536 F.3d 1049
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 17076
- 2008 WL 3271039
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a court need not accept as true “allegations that are merely conclusory”
- stating that a court is 21 not required to accept as true “allegations that are merely conclusory, unwarranted deductions of 22 fact, or unreasonable inferences”
- stating that a court is 9 not required to accept as true “allegations that are merely conclusory, unwarranted deductions of 10 fact, or unreasonable inferences”
- noting that reviewing court need not accept as true 27 “allegations that are merely conclusory, unwarranted deductions 28 of fact, or unreasonable inferences”
- noting that reviewing court need not accept as true 27 “allegations that are merely conclusory, unwarranted deductions 28 of fact, or unreasonable inferences”
- stating that a court is 18 not required to accept as true “allegations that are merely conclusory, unwarranted deductions of 19 fact, or unreasonable inferences”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kozinski, Hawkins, Cowen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
227 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2018-08-13· cited 1,539×
- Lormand v. US Unwired, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2009-04-09· cited 1,176×
- In Re Oracle Corp. Securities LitigationNinth Circuit· 2010-11-16· cited 877×
- Reese v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2011-06-29· cited 376×
- Cutera Securities Litigation v. ConnersNinth Circuit· 2010-06-30· cited 208×
- Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund v. Apollo Group Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2014-12-16· cited 180×
- Young v. City of VisaliaE.D. California· 2009-08-18· cited 111×
- WPP Luxembourg Gamma Three Sarl v. Spot Runner, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2011-08-23· cited 90×
- In re iPhone Application Litig.N.D. California· 2012-06-12· cited 78×
- Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP v. Countrywide Financial Corp.C.D. California· 2011-08-09· cited 77×
- Hinds Investments, L.P. v. AngioliNinth Circuit· 2011-08-01· cited 71×
- In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.N.D. California· 2018-03-05· cited 65×
- In Re Countrywide Financial Corporation Securities LitigationC.D. California· 2008-12-01· cited 64×
- Acticon AG v. China North East Petroleum Holdings Ltd.Second Circuit· 2012-08-01· cited 63×
- Robinson v. Alameda CountyN.D. California· 2012-06-21· cited 63×
- Murphy v. American General Life InsuranceC.D. California· 2015-01-15· cited 62×
- Frenzel v. AliphcomN.D. California· 2014-12-29· cited 54×
- Landucci v. State Farm InsuranceN.D. California· 2014-08-12· cited 53×
- Corcoran v. CVS Health Corp.N.D. California· 2016-03-14· cited 50×
- Zeiger v. Wellpet LLCN.D. California· 2018-01-17· cited 43×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsNinth Circuit· 2001-09-14· cited 2,313×
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court· 2005-04-19· cited 2,236×
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court· 2001-02-21· cited 956×
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsNinth Circuit· 2001-12-28· cited 434×
- James Odom v. Microsoft Corporation, a Washington Corporation Best Buy Co., Inc., a Minnesota CorporationNinth Circuit· 2007-05-04· cited 360×
- Emergent Capital Investment Management, LLC v. Stonepath Group, Inc., Previously Known as Net Value Holdings, Inc., Andrew Panzo and Lee HansenSecond Circuit· 2003-09-04· cited 326×
- Gompper v. Visx, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2002-08-05· cited 300×
- Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc.Second Circuit· 2005-01-20· cited 226×
- Berson v. Applied Signal Technology, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2008-06-05· cited 187×
- McCabe v. Ernst & Young, LLPThird Circuit· 2007-07-23· cited 156×
- Weber v. Department of Veterans AffairsNinth Circuit· 2008-04-04· cited 85×
- 84 Employer-Teamster Joint Council Pension Trust Fund v. America West Holding Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2003-02-13· cited 56×
- Miller v. Thane International, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2008-03-18· cited 38×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.