Skip to main content
· 10/23/2013

Leyte-Vidal v. Semel

Citations

  • 220 Cal. App. 4th 1001
  • 163 Cal. Rptr. 3d 641
  • 2013 WL 5744224
  • 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 849

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting plaintiff was 1 required to “allege facts specifically directed at demand futility with respect to at least half of the 2 directors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.