Zucco Partners, LLC v. Digimarc Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a large quantity of otherwise questionable allegations” does not create a strong inference of scienter
• concluding that SOX certifications, without more, do not sufficiently reach the strong inference standard of scienter
• holding that “[m]ere conclusory allegations” about the resignations of company executives did not, without more, give rise to a strong inference of scienter
• holding that failure to correct 8 || pleading deficiencies after dismissal is a “strong indication” that further amendment would be 9 futile
• holding that a confidential witness’ statements must be both knowledgeable and indicative of scienter
• holding that district court properly denied leave to amend when “the district court gave Plaintiffs specific instructions on how to amend the complaint, and Plaintiffs did not comply”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).