Metzler Investment GMBH v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the PSLRA requires a “clearer explication of why a statement is false” rather than a vague allegation of a false “overarching impression”
• recognizing that heightened PSLRA standard cannot be met by one statement that is “not so indicative of fraudulent intent that it carries the weight of the entire 181-page complaint for purposes of establishing a ‘strong inference’ of scienter”
• recognizing that heightened PSLRA standard cannot be met by one statement that is “not so indicative of fraudulent intent that it carries the weight of the entire 181-page complaint for purposes of establishing a ‘strong inference’ of scienter”
• explaining that “the district 15 court’s discretion to deny leave to amend is particularly broad where plaintiff has previously 16 amended the complaint” (citation omitted)
• explaining that “the district court’s discretion to deny leave to amend is particularly broad where plaintiff has previously amended the complaint” (citation omitted)
• explaining that “the district court’s discretion to deny leave to amend is particularly broad where plaintiff has previously amended the complaint” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).