Ninth Circuit· 4/27/1987
Durning v. First Boston Corp.
Citations
- 815 F.2d 1265
- 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5341
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that whether a statement is misleading is considered from the vantage of a reasonably diligent investor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tang
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
128 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Trudeau v. Federal Trade CommissionD.C. Circuit· 2006-07-28· cited 1,112×
- Regina Warshaw and John D. Kaufman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Xoma Corporation Steven C. MendellNinth Circuit· 1996-01-25· cited 416×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1996-09-13· cited 231×
- Louie N. Elias v. W.H. ConnettNinth Circuit· 1990-07-16· cited 221×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1993-11-17· cited 190×
- Fecht v. Price Co.Ninth Circuit· 1995-11-20· cited 160×
- Interpipe Contracting, Inc. v. Xavier BecerraNinth Circuit· 2018-07-30· cited 139×
- Abromson v. American Pacific Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1997-06-05· cited 127×
- Colaprico v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.N.D. California· 1991-03-13· cited 118×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ToddNinth Circuit· 2011-06-23· cited 87×
- Tyler v. CuomoNinth Circuit· 2000-12-15· cited 80×
- United States v. Southern California Edison Co.E.D. California· 2004-01-09· cited 74×
- Southwest Marine, Inc. v. Triple a MacHine Shop, Inc.N.D. California· 1989-08-31· cited 67×
- Oestreicher v. Alienware Corp.N.D. California· 2008-04-01· cited 66×
- In Re Syntex Corp. Securities LitigationN.D. California· 1994-05-27· cited 60×
- Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1988-06-07· cited 58×
- In Re Gupta Corp. Securities LitigationN.D. California· 1994-12-06· cited 46×
- Champlaie v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPE.D. California· 2009-10-22· cited 43×
- Westlands Water Dist. v. US Dept. of InteriorE.D. California· 1994-03-03· cited 41×
- In Re Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust LitigationN.D. California· 2008-02-14· cited 40×
Other cases named Durning v. First Boston Corp.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.