Nl Industries, Inc. v. Stuart M. Kaplan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that response costs can be \necessary\ even though the agency that required cleanup never approved the response actions taken
• holding, for purposes of determining whether 11 defendant is entitled to dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6
• holding, for purposes of determining whether a plaintiff states cognizable 23 claims for relief, a district court \must accept as true all material allegations in the 24 complaint and construe them in the light most favorable to [the plaintiff]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).