Nl Industries, Inc. v. Stuart M. Kaplan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that response costs can be \necessary\ even though the agency that required cleanup never approved the response actions taken
• holding, for purposes of determining whether 11 defendant is entitled to dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6
• holding, for purposes of determining whether a plaintiff states cognizable 23 claims for relief, a district court \must accept as true all material allegations in the 24 complaint and construe them in the light most favorable to [the plaintiff]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

290 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Bradley v. Chiron Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 1998-02-20· cited 250×
• Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.
  C.D. California· 2003-10-20· cited 244×
• Jeanette Daviton Candi Daviton-Sciandra v. Columbia/hca Healthcare Corporation, Dba San Leandro Hospital
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-03-01· cited 195×
• Turner v. Cook
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-04-01· cited 171×
• General Electric Company v. Litton Industrial Automation Systems, Inc. And Litton Industries, Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 1990-12-12· cited 157×
• Tanglewood East Homeowners Jimmie D. Lee, Jr. v. Charles-Thomas, Inc., First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Conroe
  First Circuit· 1988-07-28· cited 155×
• Artesian Water Co. v. Government of New Castle County
  D. Delaware· 1987-04-24· cited 127×
• Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-10-24· cited 124×
• Bureerong v. Uvawas
  C.D. California· 1996-03-21· cited 111×
• Jensen v. City of Oxnard
  Ninth Circuit· 1998-05-28· cited 111×
• Sheehy v. Lipton Industries, Inc.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-05-20· cited 97×
• Amland Properties Corp. v. Aluminum Co. of America
  D. New Jersey· 1989-04-18· cited 74×
• Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-09-14· cited 69×
• In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
  N.D. California· 2008-08-25· cited 66×
• Virgil Deveraturda Bernard Sapitalo Shirley Sampayan Maria Lillibeth Edano v. Globe Aviation Security Services
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-07-24· cited 64×
• McGLINCHY v. SHELL CHEMICAL CO.
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-07-11· cited 62×
• Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. ASARCO Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-04-28· cited 62×
• RDF Media Ltd. v. Fox Broadcasting Co.
  C.D. California· 2005-05-10· cited 57×
• Summit Technology, Inc. v. High-Line Medical Instruments, Co.
  C.D. California· 1996-07-16· cited 56×
• S. Myron Klarfeld v. United States of America United States District Court United States Marshal
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-09-13· cited 55×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-10-18· cited 858×
• Wickland Oil Terminals, a California Corporation v. Asarco, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, and State Lands Commission of California
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-06-20· cited 161×
• Preston Guillory, Frank Ritter, and Ty Ritter v. County of Orange
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-04-25· cited 95×