Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 611 S.E.2d 232
  • 363 S.C. 341
  • 2005 S.C. LEXIS 75

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding there is prejudice when but for counsel's error, there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the proceeding would have been different
  • finding this Court will uphold the PCR judge’s findings if there is any evidence of probative value in the record to support them
  • stating the first prong of the Strickland test requires the applicant to prove “counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness” (citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 688, 104 S.Ct. at 2064, 80 L.Ed.2d at 693)
  • where there is no evidence to support finding of prejudice, grant of PCR is reversed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Moore, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.