State v. Makins
Syllabus
Ontario Stefon Patrick Makins appeals his conviction for third degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC) with a minor, arguing the circuit court erred in (1) refusing to allow Makins to cross examine the victim (Victim) about her prior allegations of sexual abuse and (2) allowing a therapist to essentially vouch for Victim's credibility by testifying both as a fact witness regarding Victim's allegations of abuse and an expert witness on child sexual abuse trauma. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-07-26· cited 1,327×
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-09-19· cited 122×
- State v. KromahSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-01-23· cited 94×
- State v. DawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-02-21· cited 69×
- State v. ChavisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-02-04· cited 60×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-11-15· cited 47×
- State v. McKERLEYCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-03-28· cited 36×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-07-05· cited 33×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-08-05· cited 28×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-01-07· cited 24×
- State v. DempseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-06-05· cited 19×
- Briggs v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-10-25· cited 17×
- State v. SweetCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-07-31· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.