California Court of Appeal· 8/31/2004

People v. Johnson

Citations

18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 230
121 Cal. App. 4th 1409
2004 Daily Journal DAR 10854
2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8091
2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1458

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that probation revocation proceedings are not criminal prosecutions
“A laboratory report does not ‘bear testimony,’ or function as the equivalent of in-court testimony.” (Citation omitted.)
laboratory report “was not a substitute for live testimony at [defendant’s] revocation hearing; it was routine documentary evidence”
laboratory report analyzing rock cocaine that defendant had been seen selling not testimonial under Crawford because it “was not a substitute for live testimony,” but “was routine documentary evidence”
Roberts, the governing law at the time “afforded scant grounds for objection.”
laboratory reports routine and nontestimonial documents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parrilli

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.