Michels v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether statements are testimonial is a legal issue subject to de novo review
• adopting view of other courts that “documents establishing the existence or absence of some objective fact, rather than detailing the criminal wrongdoing of the defendant, are not ‘testimonial’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).