Skip to main content

Citations

  • 8 A.D.3d 888
  • 780 N.Y.S.2d 393
  • 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8851

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding under Crawford that admission of blood test results violated Confrontation Clause
  • results of blood test of victim of crime considered testimonial, when state requested test to establish victim’s intoxication and lack of consent in rape prosecution
  • report requested by and prepared for law enforcement for the purpose of prosecution
  • report of private company that performed blood test testimonial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.