Skip to main content
M.D. Florida· 8/5/2016

Blitz Telecom Consulting, LLC v. Peerless Network, Inc.

Citations

  • 212 F. Supp. 3d 1232
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186430
  • 2016 WL 7325543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he parties’ contractual agreement to be bound by Illinois law controls [the plaintiff’s] request for prejudgment interest in this case.”
  • Florida considers both the entitlement to prejudgment interest and the applicable rate to be matters of substantive law; parties’ choice of law in contract governs interest rate
  • Florida considers both the entitlement to prejudgment interest and the applicable rate to be matters of substantive law; parties’ choice of law in contract governs interest rate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Byron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.