Schwan's Sales Enterprises, Inc. v. Sig Pack, Inc., Doboy Division

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that interpreting a choice-of-law clause’s scope under the chosen law rather than the forum law would “give effect to that provision before the court’s analytical determination of what effect it should have”
• concluding that interpreting a choice-of-law clause's scope under the chosen law rather than the forum law would “give effect to that provision before the court's analytical determination of what effect it should have”
• concluding that interpreting a choice-of-law clause's scope under the chosen law rather than the forum law would “give effect to that provision before the court's analytical determination of what effect it should have”
• reasoning that, to apply the whole law of the selected state “would basically give effect to that provision before the court’s analytical determination of what effect it should have”
• Courts “look to the conflict- of-law principles of the state where the district court sits.”
• “[T]he issue of prejudgment interest . . . is a procedural matter for conflict-of- laws purposes under Minnesota law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).