FIRST NAT. BANK OF LAGRANGE v. Lowrey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the appellant waived his contention by failing to cite pertinent authority in support as required by Rule 341(h)(7)
• stating “the issue of whether the trial court would have approved the settlement is a question of law to be decided by the trial court in the legal malpractice case”
• pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 341(h)(7) (210 Ill. 2d R. 341(h)(7)), lack of argument or citation to authority results in waiver
• “Mere contentions, without argument or citation of authority, do not merit consideration on appeal and are waived.”
• “Mere contentions, without argument or citation of authority, do not merit consideration on appeal and are waived.”
• “Mere contentions, without argument or citation of authority, do not merit consideration on appeal and are waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).