Massey v. David

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding certain statutory terms were prefatory because they \d[id] not actually define a substantive right\
• noting that article V, section 2, subsection(a) of the Florida Constitution “provides [the supreme court] with the exclusive authority to ‘adopt rules for the practice and procedure in all court’”
• “[W]here this Court has promulgated rules that relate to practice and procedure, and a statute provides a contrary practice or procedure, the statute is unconstitutional to the extent of the conflict.”
• “[W]here this Court has promulgated rules that relate to practice and procedure, and a statute provides a contrary practice or procedure, the statute is unconstitutional to the extent of the conflict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).