Keith Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia, (FARC)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that movant waived “his right to object to any defects in the service of process or to any denial of his right to be heard” because he “sat on his rights for nine months” but addressing alleged jurisdiction issues
• explaining that party seeking to execute against assets of terrorist party’s agency or instrumentality under TRIA “must . . . establish that the purported agency or instrumentality is actually an agency or instrumentality”
• noting the first requirement \can be definitively established by the fact that OFAC has taken action against the alleged agency or instrumentality under . . . the IEEPA\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).