Skip to main content
· 8/9/1989

Zayre Corporation v. S.M. & R. Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 882 F.2d 1145
  • 28 Fed. R. Serv. 793
  • 9 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 465
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12399
  • 1989 WL 92005

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant forfeited its argument against the introduc- tion of summaries of expense records by failing to move to compel discovery of the records
  • refusing to consider new arguments about why oral contract survived Illinois statute of frauds
  • challenging alleged business records by questioning “the source of data for the printouts, the data’s accuracy, the input procedures used to feed the data into the computer, or whether the computer was working properly”
  • letters between company presidents unlikely to satisfy writing requirement be- cause they did not mention agreement to buy jewelry or agreement to pay mark-up price for it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Cudahy, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.