Skip to main content
· 7/3/1985

Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co.

Citations

  • 474 So. 2d 212
  • 10 Fla. L. Weekly 353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that prejudgment interest on a party’s out-of-pocket pecuniary losses is a legal entitlement once a verdict has liquidated those damages as of a date certain
  • noting that prejudgment interest is intended to compensate the successful claimant for the loss of the use of the money between the date when he is entitled to the money and the date of the judgment
  • finding that Florida courts “do[] not have discretion” in applying prejudgment interest
  • finding that Florida courts “do[] not have discretion” in applying prejudgment interest
  • rejecting the theory according to which an award of prejudgment interest is regarded as a penalty
  • awarding prejudgment interest in subrogation action to recover monies paid for negligent property loss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ehrlich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.