Skip to main content
Federal Claims· 12/20/2006

Biddulph v. United States

Citations

  • 74 Fed. Cl. 765
  • 98 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 8380
  • 2006 U.S. Claims LEXIS 408
  • 2006 WL 3821840

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “a court may not similarly take a liberal view of [a] jurisdictional requirement and set a different rule for pro se litigants only.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hodges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Biddulph v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.