Acadia Technology, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 17 the plaintiff’s claim that the government ran afoul of the customs statutes when seizing goods did 18 not support a takings claim
• holding that the plaintiff’s assertions that a government agency’s actions violated certain statutes “did not form the basis for a legal claim under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment”
• holding that in a takings case, the court assumes that the underlying action was lawful and decides only whether the governmental action in question constituted a taking for which compensation must be paid
• holding that in a takings case, the court assumes that the underlying action was lawful and decides only whether the governmental action in question constituted a taking for which compensation must be paid
• explaining that a “takings claim” pursuant to the Tucker Act is “separate from a challenge to the lawfulness of the government’s conduct”
• explaining that a “takings claim” pursuant to the Tucker Act is “separate from a challenge to the lawfulness of the government’s conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).