Charles William Ledford v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the United States Court ofFederal Claims does not have jurisdiction to consider ftabeas petitions
• holding that “[t]he Court of Federal Claims is not a district court of the United States, and therefore it lacks subject matter jurisdiction” to hear section 7433(a) claims
• explaining that the Court of Federal Claims was not one of the courts authorized by statute to grant habeas relief
• confirming that the United States Court of Federal Claims, as a non-Article III court, cannot hear matters solely in the purview of the district courts
• explaining that the Court of Federal Claims was not one of the courts authorized by statute to grant habeas relief
• explaining that the Court of Federal Claims is not a district court of the United States

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).