Federal Claims· 1/26/2007

Minehan v. United States

Citations

75 Fed. Cl. 249
99 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1061
2007 U.S. Claims LEXIS 32
2007 WL 489224

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the court has no duty to create a claim where a prose plaintiff has not spelled out such a claim in the complaint
“[A] court may not similarly take a liberal view of that jurisdictional requirement and set a different rule for pro se litigants only.”
“[T]he leniency afforded to a pro se litigant with respect to mere formalities does not relieve the burden to meet jurisdictional requirements.”
“[Tjhe leniency afforded to a pro se litigant with respect to mere formalities does not relieve the burden to meet jurisdictional requirements.”
“[A] court may not similarly take a liberal view of that jurisdictional requirement and set a different rule for pro se litigants only.”
\[A] court may not similarly take a liberal view of that jurisdictional requirement and set a different rule for prose litigants only.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bush

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

149 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.