Donna Kelley v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[A] court may not similarly take a liberal view of [a] jurisdictional requirement and set a different rule for pro se litigants only.\
• \[A] court may not similarly take a liberal view of [a] jurisdictional requirement and set a different rule for pro se litigants only.\
• \[A] court may not similarly take a liberal view of that jurisdictional requirement and set a different rule for prose litigants only.\
• “[L]eniency with re- spect to mere formalities should be extended to a pro se party.”
• “[A] court may not take a liberal view of [] jurisdictional requirement[s] and set a different rule for pro se litigants only.”
• “[A] court may not . . . take a liberal view of . . . jurisdictional requirement[s] and set a different rule for pro se litigants only.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).